Get Da 2166 9 1 Form in PDF

1. What is the DA 2166 9 1 form used for?

   The DA 2166 9 1 form is an NCO Evaluation Report specifically designed for the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant (SGT). It serves as a formal record of an NCO's performance and potential, providing a structured way for raters and senior raters to assess various aspects of the NCO's duties and competencies.

2. Who completes the DA 2166 9 1 form?

   The form is completed by the NCO’s rater, who is typically a supervisor or a higher-ranking NCO. The senior rater, often a higher-level supervisor, also reviews and signs the form. The rated NCO has the opportunity to acknowledge the report by signing it, although this signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with the evaluations.

3. What information is required in Part I of the form?

   Part I collects essential administrative data. This includes the NCO's name, Social Security Number (or DOD ID), rank, date of rank, unit information, and the period covered by the evaluation. Accurate completion of this section is crucial as it ensures the report is properly attributed and relevant to the correct time frame.

4. What are the key areas evaluated in Part IV?

   Part IV focuses on the performance evaluation of the NCO. It assesses various attributes, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each of these areas is rated as "Met" or "Did Not Meet Standard," accompanied by comments that provide context and detail about the NCO's performance in those categories.

5. How does the appeals process work?

   The appeals process allows an NCO to contest the evaluations provided in the report. If the NCO disagrees with the assessment, they can initiate an appeal according to the guidelines set forth in AR 623-3. This ensures that NCOs have a mechanism to address any concerns about their evaluations and seek clarification or correction if needed.

6. What is the significance of the senior rater’s evaluation?

   The senior rater's evaluation is critical as it provides a broader perspective on the NCO’s potential compared to peers. This section helps to determine the NCO's future assignments and career progression. The senior rater selects a qualification level—ranging from "Most Qualified" to "Not Qualified"—which can significantly impact the NCO's career trajectory.

Misconceptions about the DA Form 2166-9-1 can lead to confusion and mistakes in the evaluation process. Here are six common misconceptions:

• Misconception 1: The form is only for senior NCOs.

This is not true. The DA Form 2166-9-1 is specifically designed for the evaluation of Sergeants (SGTs), making it essential for all NCOs at this rank to understand its importance.

• Misconception 2: Signing the form means agreement with the evaluation.

Many believe that signing the form indicates agreement with the rater's assessment. In reality, the rated NCO's signature only verifies that the administrative data is correct, not their agreement with the evaluation.

• Misconception 3: The form is optional.

Some individuals think that submitting this evaluation form is optional. However, it is a required document for performance evaluations and plays a critical role in career progression.

• Misconception 4: Only the rater's comments matter.

While the rater's comments are significant, the senior rater's evaluation also carries weight. Their assessment provides a broader perspective on the rated NCO's potential and performance.

• Misconception 5: The form does not require any additional documentation.

It's a common belief that the DA Form 2166-9-1 stands alone. In fact, it may require additional enclosures, especially if there are unique circumstances or performance issues that need to be addressed.

• Misconception 6: The evaluation process is the same for all branches.

This misconception overlooks the fact that the DA Form 2166-9-1 is specific to the Army. Other branches of the military have their own evaluation forms and processes, which may differ significantly.

1. Incomplete Name Information: Failing to provide the full name (last, first, middle initial) of the rated NCO can lead to processing delays.

2. Incorrect SSN or DOD ID: Entering an incorrect Social Security Number or Department of Defense ID can cause identification issues.

3. Missing Email Addresses: Not including the rated NCO's or rater's email address can hinder communication about the evaluation.

4. Improper Date Format: Using an incorrect date format (YYYYMMDD) can lead to confusion and errors in record-keeping.

5. Failure to Sign: Neglecting to sign the form can invalidate the submission and require resubmission.

6. Omitting Counseling Dates: Not including all required counseling dates can create ambiguity regarding performance evaluations.

7. Inaccurate Duty Descriptions: Providing vague or incomplete descriptions of daily duties and responsibilities can misrepresent the rated NCO's role.

8. Ignoring Performance Standards: Failing to address whether the rated NCO met standards in various categories can lead to an incomplete evaluation.